Kind of censored names?
Cwg: the us
Sent at 12:03 AM on Sunday
CWg: to act
or not to act
ethically morally
me: what do yo uthink?
CWg: strategicaly
i honestly think the world community won't act
... somehow the convo goes to debate
and then SwgClutcher went off about WWIII
Zhy: do you mean syria?
Sent at 12:07 AM on Sunday
me: indeed.
do you think we should invade
Zhy: well i don't really like war
peace? hm, i only wish ^
I personally would like to avoid war. If there's any any other approach we can try, we should take it. Honestly, I'm not sure what we'd show by bombing an already war-ravaged country. I question the effectiveness of it. If we're going to start another war just to save face in the global community, please, let's rethink this.
I'm not even sure how much evidence we have of this alleged chemical attack. I just hope Congress has enough rationale to do the right thing with whatever (or lack of) evidence we have. Please, just make the right choice.
Cwg: the us
Sent at 12:03 AM on Sunday
CWg: to act
or not to act
ethically morally
me: what do yo uthink?
CWg: strategicaly
i honestly think the world community won't act
... somehow the convo goes to debate
and then SwgClutcher went off about WWIII
Zhy: do you mean syria?
Sent at 12:07 AM on Sunday
me: indeed.
do you think we should invade
Zhy: well i don't really like war
peace? hm, i only wish ^
I personally would like to avoid war. If there's any any other approach we can try, we should take it. Honestly, I'm not sure what we'd show by bombing an already war-ravaged country. I question the effectiveness of it. If we're going to start another war just to save face in the global community, please, let's rethink this.
I'm not even sure how much evidence we have of this alleged chemical attack. I just hope Congress has enough rationale to do the right thing with whatever (or lack of) evidence we have. Please, just make the right choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment